moshecaspi
Member
אני מנסה להבין את הפסקה הבאה שעוסקת בכיצד ומדוע אדם שאינו אזרח של האיחוד האירופי יכול לתבוע חברה באיחוד. אודה להבהרת הנושא.
Non-EU claimants
Given the definition of ‘cross-border’, and having regard to the effect
of the jurisdiction provisions in the Brussels I (recast) Regulation, in
certain circumstances a claimant domiciled or habitually resident in a
non-EU Member State may be able to make use of the ESCP against
a defendant who is domiciled or habitually resident within the EU. This
would be the case where the defendant is domiciled or habitually
resident in a Member State other than that of the competent court
since then that party is not in the same State as the court since this
meets the conditions of Article 3(1)".
Given the definition of ‘cross-border’, and having regard to the effect
of the jurisdiction provisions in the Brussels I (recast) Regulation, in
certain circumstances a claimant domiciled or habitually resident in a
non-EU Member State may be able to make use of the ESCP against
a defendant who is domiciled or habitually resident within the EU. This
would be the case where the defendant is domiciled or habitually
resident in a Member State other than that of the competent court
since then that party is not in the same State as the court since this
meets the conditions of Article 3(1)".