שאלה חשובה: לווארטי וקרלוצה
- פותח הנושא rifkin1
- פורסם בתאריך
אוקיי אז.......
זה משהו שמישהי כתבה על הראיון: Well that was a damper on my mood today *sigh* What I dont' understand is that she said "I... am single, I'm single, I'm boring and home on Saturday all by myself." If it was done this morning. then it should be Monday night in LA. I'm confused about that. She sounded REALLY uncomfortable though ... וזאת תגובה של מישהי אחרת שאיתה אני מסכימה: an we just drop the subject. It was a comment she said. Propably to get the press off her back. We know they don't like talking about each other to much with the media. Personally I never believe anything unless her rep/s confirm it.
זה משהו שמישהי כתבה על הראיון: Well that was a damper on my mood today *sigh* What I dont' understand is that she said "I... am single, I'm single, I'm boring and home on Saturday all by myself." If it was done this morning. then it should be Monday night in LA. I'm confused about that. She sounded REALLY uncomfortable though ... וזאת תגובה של מישהי אחרת שאיתה אני מסכימה: an we just drop the subject. It was a comment she said. Propably to get the press off her back. We know they don't like talking about each other to much with the media. Personally I never believe anything unless her rep/s confirm it.
ועוד תגובה>>>
של מישהו אחר: okay i just listened to the interview and here are somethings to talk about the guy asked her about her divorce early this year & she replied that was a year ago & don't want to talk about it becoz she's over it (meaning done some time on 2003) not a single mention about electra it that sufficient evidence? that it was from last year (אבל נראה לי שווארטוש תוכל לעזור יותר
, לדעתי זה סתם...)
של מישהו אחר: okay i just listened to the interview and here are somethings to talk about the guy asked her about her divorce early this year & she replied that was a year ago & don't want to talk about it becoz she's over it (meaning done some time on 2003) not a single mention about electra it that sufficient evidence? that it was from last year (אבל נראה לי שווארטוש תוכל לעזור יותר
נראה לי שכן
אחרי דיון ארוך שהגיע לשישה דפים...היא החליטה לסגור את התיקיה הזאת. אבל המסקנה היא שזה ראיון ישן והם ביחד... מעניין מי גורם לכל הטרארם הזה. אני בטוחה שיש מישהו שגורם לזה. אף פעם לא ראיתי שום סלבריטי שדיברו כל כך הרבה על נפרדים או לא. בעצם בניפר. אבל חוץ מהם. בטוח יש משהו בכל זה...מעניין אותי מאחורי הקלעים של כל הסיפור הזה.
אחרי דיון ארוך שהגיע לשישה דפים...היא החליטה לסגור את התיקיה הזאת. אבל המסקנה היא שזה ראיון ישן והם ביחד... מעניין מי גורם לכל הטרארם הזה. אני בטוחה שיש מישהו שגורם לזה. אף פעם לא ראיתי שום סלבריטי שדיברו כל כך הרבה על נפרדים או לא. בעצם בניפר. אבל חוץ מהם. בטוח יש משהו בכל זה...מעניין אותי מאחורי הקלעים של כל הסיפור הזה.
ווארטוש זה בסדר, תקראי את זה!!!
זה הרבה לקרוא אבל זה שווה. Morning everyone! I'm posting as Mandy has asked me. A couple of clarifications on this whole hoopla concerning the Aussie interview. The original interview was done in the Spring with Jennifer during her media blitz for 13. The DJ did have a follow up call to her on the 8th. He did this to update with her as the whole Affleck story was hitting there. This is how and why he is claiming he spoke to her on the 8th and the interview is current. I know this because of a response he sent a friend via e-mail before the rush of fans spamming him with questions concerning this. Of note, this is the Australian Ted C. by the way and he is now trying to squeeze every ounce of publicity out of this interview. Jennifer didn't tell him anything she hadn't already been saying to the American and other foreign press at the time. In fact it's almost verbatim. A lot of people are questioning the change in the name of the movie believing this is proof , it's current, it's not. The studio knew months ahead of releasing this film in Australia and abroad it was going to change the name. Movie studio's plan so far in advance for this it's ridiculous that people are using that as so called proof. It's a simple case of calling Coca Cola, tonic, soda or pop depending on what region of the US you live in. It's a non issue. The thing people should remember is that this movie's audience is not/was not the same group as say Bourne Supremacy or Collateral. It's target audience was teens and young women. She isn't going to discuss living with her boyfriend while promoting the film. The whole interview was obviously going down a path that Jennifer didn't want to go. For those people who claim that Jennifer can't stop talking about her marriage and divorce from Foley, listen to the interview. She clearly states she is so OVER the whole thing and trying to move on. Jennifer has tried and tried to put that to rest but the media and some so called fans won't let her. They keep dragging it up looking for some sort of big soap opera drama. It's over. Foley has moved on with his life and so should everyone else.
זה הרבה לקרוא אבל זה שווה. Morning everyone! I'm posting as Mandy has asked me. A couple of clarifications on this whole hoopla concerning the Aussie interview. The original interview was done in the Spring with Jennifer during her media blitz for 13. The DJ did have a follow up call to her on the 8th. He did this to update with her as the whole Affleck story was hitting there. This is how and why he is claiming he spoke to her on the 8th and the interview is current. I know this because of a response he sent a friend via e-mail before the rush of fans spamming him with questions concerning this. Of note, this is the Australian Ted C. by the way and he is now trying to squeeze every ounce of publicity out of this interview. Jennifer didn't tell him anything she hadn't already been saying to the American and other foreign press at the time. In fact it's almost verbatim. A lot of people are questioning the change in the name of the movie believing this is proof , it's current, it's not. The studio knew months ahead of releasing this film in Australia and abroad it was going to change the name. Movie studio's plan so far in advance for this it's ridiculous that people are using that as so called proof. It's a simple case of calling Coca Cola, tonic, soda or pop depending on what region of the US you live in. It's a non issue. The thing people should remember is that this movie's audience is not/was not the same group as say Bourne Supremacy or Collateral. It's target audience was teens and young women. She isn't going to discuss living with her boyfriend while promoting the film. The whole interview was obviously going down a path that Jennifer didn't want to go. For those people who claim that Jennifer can't stop talking about her marriage and divorce from Foley, listen to the interview. She clearly states she is so OVER the whole thing and trying to move on. Jennifer has tried and tried to put that to rest but the media and some so called fans won't let her. They keep dragging it up looking for some sort of big soap opera drama. It's over. Foley has moved on with his life and so should everyone else.
gilmorefreak
New member
../images/Emo178.gif קראתי...../images/Emo3.gif
ואוו כמה בלאגן..טוב אז אממ..כרגע הם ביחד?
ואוו כמה בלאגן..טוב אז אממ..כרגע הם ביחד?
יש לי רעיון נפלא !!!
בואו נתחיל שמועה משלנו.
לאור העובדה שאנחנו טוחנים פה מים על כלום (ואגב...נראה לי שהם בוודאות נפרדו. אם יש משהו שלמדתי הוא ש"חצי אמת גרועה יותר משקר"), נראה לי שמוטב שפורום זהות בדויה יצא בפרוייקט קיץ חדש: הפצת שמועה זדונית חדשה אודות גן ומייקל
אני אומרת שלאור כל השטויות שמאכילים אותנו לאחרונה, עלינו להמציא משהו מטופש ומטומטם ולהפיץ אותו בפורומים רלוונטיים ברחבי העולם, כגון: ג'ן ומייקל נפרדו כי היא מתחרטת על גירושיה ובגלל זה לא נראתה ביניהם כימיה על המסך בעונה ה - 3... וכדומה... יש למישהו הצעות? פורום זהות בדויה של תפוז אנשים נוקם !
בואו נתחיל שמועה משלנו.
Copyright©1996-2021,Tapuz Media Ltd. Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.