The Partnership model
The partnership model proves to be the most successful bus business model -outside London.
What do I mean by that?
An efficient bus network can not stand on it's own feet without some infrasturcture- bus stations, priority measures- otherwise you can not really run bus network.
On the other hand, councils and planners, or major developers might want to encourage the use of public transport instead of cars- for all manner of reasons such as air pollution, lack of parking space, reduce congestion etc.
Local authorities might want to join in,- they may wish the bus company to encourage the provision of a certain degree of evening or weekend services as part of their 'service package'.
All of this leads to the obvious- a partnership - working together.
So if a bus company works with city authorites, major developers and employers [airport, universities, factory owners, shopping/leisure maga centres], this actually greatly enhance bus services, increase ridership and profitablility.
The examples to look around in the UK are: Brighton, Oxford, Cambridge,
and Nottingham and Reading- this is 'council lead' as opposed to private company lead.
I suggest that you look at the bus network in those places to see how it should be done.
It is not exacly a co-incidence that Arriva and First are not involved in any of those partnerships...
So it is not all about freedom to run buses anywhere you want, charge whatever prices you want etc.
It is about forming an effective partnership as explained above.
Bus services do not exist in a stand alone world.
regards
Yoram
The Partnership modelon what evidence do you base your claim?
I do not have the space or the time to go through the 1985 bus deregulation in the UK- outside London.
Bus operators had the freedom to fix their routes, fares and frequencies outside London ever since 1985.
This free for all had some very mixed results.
Overall, the bus network contracted- less coverage, and an almost universal withdrawl or rural services and evening and weekend services.
In a free for all, the advantage goes to the operator with the strongest financial backing or nerve.
For a while, there is competition- on the most lucrative market- and during peak hours.
so prices are down, frequencies are up, but profit margins fall.
eventually, one of the players withdraws, and than we are back to a private monopoly- offering a fairly limited service.
Then another factor came into being- managment quality.
It is a bit like a postcode lottery- depending on where you live, you might have got a good bus company like Stagecoach or Go Ahead, or a lousy and badly mananged company like First or Arriva.
Arriva and First are reknown for cutting services and frequencies and running their bus network down.
It creates a vicious circle of reduced income,, more cuts, reduced income, etc- till you end up with no bus services at all.
The success stories tell their own tale, and it is not about fares, routes network or prices, but it is about working in tandem with local town halls and other interested parties. see next email
The partnership model proves to be the most successful bus business model -outside London.
What do I mean by that?
An efficient bus network can not stand on it's own feet without some infrasturcture- bus stations, priority measures- otherwise you can not really run bus network.
On the other hand, councils and planners, or major developers might want to encourage the use of public transport instead of cars- for all manner of reasons such as air pollution, lack of parking space, reduce congestion etc.
Local authorities might want to join in,- they may wish the bus company to encourage the provision of a certain degree of evening or weekend services as part of their 'service package'.
All of this leads to the obvious- a partnership - working together.
So if a bus company works with city authorites, major developers and employers [airport, universities, factory owners, shopping/leisure maga centres], this actually greatly enhance bus services, increase ridership and profitablility.
The examples to look around in the UK are: Brighton, Oxford, Cambridge,
and Nottingham and Reading- this is 'council lead' as opposed to private company lead.
I suggest that you look at the bus network in those places to see how it should be done.
It is not exacly a co-incidence that Arriva and First are not involved in any of those partnerships...
So it is not all about freedom to run buses anywhere you want, charge whatever prices you want etc.
It is about forming an effective partnership as explained above.
Bus services do not exist in a stand alone world.
regards
Yoram